Guy de la Bédoyère's The Real Lives of Roman Britain is not a narrative history of Roman Britain. (De la Bédoyère has already written several versions of that narrative.) It is instead an attempt to look at the 360 years of Roman occupation in terms of human experience rather than "the generalities of military campaigns, the antics of emperors, the arid plains of statistical models and typologies of pottery, the skeletal remains of buildings, and theoretical archaeological agendas."
The attempt is not entirely successful due to a problem that de la Bédoyère identifies early in the book as "visibility." There is surprisingly little evidence, physical or textual, concerning the Roman experience in Britain, and even less about individuals--often no more than a name and a hint. (Sometimes not even a name. One individual, known as the "Aldgate-Pulborough Potter," is recognizable only by the distinctive incompetence of his work.) Consequently, much of the book is devoted less to the lives of Roman Britain and more to an evaluation of the available evidence.
In lesser hands, this close analysis of inscriptions, clay tablets, pottery shards and, yes, the skeletal remains of buildings, could be as dry as the dust from which they are taken. De la Bédoyère considers each bit of evidence with wit and imagination, leading the reader with him on the path of discovery rather than simply providing his conclusions. --Pamela Toler, blogging at History in the Margins